Chart summaries
Problem lists, recent events and open items summarized for the next clinician.
Chart summaries, prior-authorization packets and coding support that keep protected health information on your own network, under the HIPAA controls you already run.
Clinical and revenue-cycle teams spend hours assembling information that already exists in the record. AI can do the assembling, but PHI should not travel to a model vendor to make that happen.
We deploy models inside your environment, connect through your EHR's supported interfaces and log every access the way your privacy office expects.
| Systems | Epic, Oracle Health, athenahealth via FHIR/HL7 |
|---|---|
| Controls | HIPAA safeguards, minimum necessary, access logs |
| Agreements | Business associate agreement available |
| Deployment | On-premises or private cloud |
Problem lists, recent events and open items summarized for the next clinician.
Payer packets assembled from the record with the evidence cited.
Suggested codes with the documentation that supports each one.
Drafted letters and portal replies for staff to review and send.
Clinicians and revenue-cycle staff spend a large share of their day gathering information that already sits in the record. AI can do that gathering well. The concern is where protected health information goes in the process. A public AI service adds a new business associate, a new data flow and a new set of retention terms to review.
Private AI for healthcare runs open-weight models inside your own network or cloud account. PHI stays in the environment your privacy and security teams already govern, under the access controls, audit logging and risk analysis your HIPAA program already covers.
Searches for HIPAA compliant AI usually mean a tool that fits inside a covered entity's existing safeguards. No software is compliant on its own. Compliance belongs to the organization. We build each system to support your program in specific ways.
The best fits are tasks where staff assemble information for someone else to review.
Start with an administrative or documentation task that a person already reviews, such as prior-authorization packet assembly for one service line. Validate it with clinicians and coders on historical cases, measure accuracy against what was actually submitted, and only then run it on live work.
Avoid first projects that produce diagnoses, treatment recommendations or triage decisions without clinician review. Those uses raise patient safety questions and may fall under FDA oversight of clinical decision support software. Avoid screen scraping too. We connect through FHIR, HL7 and vendor-supported EHR interfaces.
Our custom AI development work connects to Epic, Oracle Health or athenahealth through supported interfaces and deploys on-premises or in your private cloud. Outputs are drafts. Nothing is written back to the record until a person accepts it. You own the code, prompts and evaluation sets.
Map exactly which data each use case touches and why.
FHIR and vendor-supported EHR interfaces, never screen scraping.
Clinician review on historical cases before live use.
Inside your network with access logs for your privacy office.
HIPAA compliance belongs to your organization's program, and no single tool provides it. We build private AI to support your program with minimum necessary scoping, role-based access, audit logging and on-network deployment. Your privacy and security officers decide how the system fits your policies and risk analysis.
Not unless you decide it should. Models run on your infrastructure or in a cloud account you control, so prompts, records and outputs stay inside your environment. No request goes to an outside AI provider by default.
Yes. A business associate agreement with LLM.co is available where our work involves PHI. We also design builds so our engineers can develop and test with de-identified or synthetic data, which limits how much PHI anyone outside your organization needs to see.
We connect to Epic, Oracle Health and athenahealth through FHIR, HL7 and other vendor-supported interfaces. We do not use screen scraping. Integration scope follows the minimum necessary standard, so each use case reads only the data it needs.
Yes. Summaries, packets, code suggestions and letters are drafts for clinical or administrative review. Each statement links back to its source in the record. Nothing is written to the chart or sent to a patient or payer until a person accepts it.
A documentation or administrative task that staff already review, such as prior-authorization packets for one service line or discharge summary drafts for one unit. Validate on historical cases with clinicians before going live. Avoid first projects that make diagnostic or treatment decisions.
Yes. Many organizations start with dedicated GPUs in their own cloud account under their existing cloud agreement, then move on-premises once usage is steady. We size both options during discovery so you can compare them.
Tell us the workflow and where the data lives. An engineer, not a salesperson, replies within one business day with a first take on architecture and cost.