Claims intake
First notice of loss read, classified and set up with fields filled.
Claims intake, triage and underwriting memos drafted from the full file, with policyholder data kept in your environment.
Claims and underwriting files are long, mixed and full of personal information. Private AI reads them in full and drafts the summary, while the data stays where your regulators expect it to be.
| Systems | Guidewire, Duck Creek, document management exports |
|---|---|
| Controls | PII handling, audit trail, state data rules |
| Deployment | On-premises or private cloud |
First notice of loss read, classified and set up with fields filled.
Complexity and fraud signals flagged for adjuster review.
Submissions summarized against your guidelines.
Coverage questions answered with the policy language cited.
A claim file is long and mixed. It holds the FNOL report, photos, adjuster notes, repair estimates, medical bills, police reports, recorded statements and letters from counsel. Adjusters spend a large share of their day reading and rekeying that material. Well-built AI for insurance claims reads the whole file, fills the fields and drafts the summary, so the adjuster starts from a complete picture.
That file is also full of personal, health and financial information. State insurance data security laws, privacy rules and your own reinsurance and vendor agreements limit where it can go. LLM.co builds private AI for insurers on open-weight models that run in your data center or your own cloud account. Claims and underwriting data never pass through a third-party model API.
Claims automation works best where volume is high and the steps are already written down in your claims manual.
Commercial submissions arrive as broker emails with ACORD forms, schedules of values, loss runs and supplemental applications. Underwriting AI extracts that data into your rating and workbench tools, compares the risk against your guidelines and appetite, and drafts the underwriting memo with each point tied to its source page.
Renewals follow the same pattern. The system pulls the prior year's file, notes what changed and lists open questions for the underwriter. The underwriter makes every pricing and acceptance decision.
Claims and underwriting decisions affect policyholders directly, so the controls matter as much as the model. Every system we build for insurers includes these.
AI for insurance claims is easiest to evaluate on intake, where every field has a known correct value. Pick one high-volume intake queue in one line of business, such as personal auto glass or property FNOL. You already have years of closed claims there to build an evaluation set from. Avoid starting with litigated or catastrophe files, where documents are least consistent and the cost of error is highest.
Work starts with a two-week discovery sprint. A focused first system usually reaches production in eight to twelve weeks, connected to Guidewire, Duck Creek or your own platform through existing APIs.
Packaged claims tools are built for an average carrier. Your claims manual, coverage forms, authority levels and reserving practices are your own. Custom AI development from LLM.co builds around them, and you own the code, prompts, evaluation sets and any fine-tuned weights at handover. There is no per-claim or per-seat fee. Your team can run the system, or we can operate it under a support agreement with quarterly evaluation reports.
Start with the highest-volume intake.
Fields and flags with confidence levels.
Adjusters and underwriters confirm before action.
On-premises or private cloud.
It reads incoming claim documents, classifies them, fills fields in your claims system, flags complexity and fraud indicators for review, and drafts summaries and letters. Adjusters review and approve the output. The system does not make coverage or payment decisions, and every statement cites the document it came from.
It stays on infrastructure you control. Private AI for insurers runs open-weight models in your data center or your own cloud account. Prompts, documents and logs stay inside your boundary, and nothing is sent to a third-party model provider unless you decide it may.
Yes. We integrate through the platform's APIs and your document management system so extracted fields, notes and drafts land in the claim or submission record. Where an API is limited, we work from scheduled exports. Adjusters keep working in the screens they already use.
Flags are reasons for a closer look, routed to SIU staff who decide. Each flag shows the facts that triggered it. We document the inputs the model uses and exclude protected characteristics, so your compliance team can review the logic as part of its own program.
We build it to support the underwriter. It extracts submission data, checks it against your guidelines and drafts the memo. Rating stays in your existing rating engine, and pricing and acceptance decisions stay with the underwriter.
We build an evaluation set from closed claims or bound submissions with known correct answers. The system is scored on field accuracy, classification and summary quality before any adjuster uses it on live work. The same set is re-run on every model or prompt change.
It is built to support your information security program and your state regulators' expectations. Data stays in your environment, access follows your roles, and every action is logged. Your compliance and legal teams decide how the system fits your filings and controls.
Tell us the workflow and where the data lives. An engineer, not a salesperson, replies within one business day with a first take on architecture and cost.